NORDIC PROCUREMENT ENFORCEMENT
  LEGAL RESEARCH PROJECT
   

   
 
 
 
    
 
 
Previous
Up
Next		   
   
c3-7.a-b
c3-7.c
c3-8
c3-9.1.1
c3-9.1.2
c3-9.2
c3-9.3
c3-9.4
u3-17.5
c3-9.5.a.1
c3-9.5.a.2
c3-9.5.a.3
c3-9.5.b.1
c3-9.5.b.2
c3-9.5.b.3
u3-17.8
c3-9.6
c3-9.7.1.a
c3-9.7.1.b
c3-9.7.2
c3-9.8.a
c3-9.8.b
c3-9.9
q2-61

32004L0018: c3-9.9

Framework, dynamic

EU Law Community DK Law EU Cases DK Cases

EU Law

32004L0018 - Classic (3rd generation) Article 9.9
9. With regard to framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems, the value to be taken into consideration shall be the maximum estimated value net of VAT of all the contracts envisaged for the total term of the framework agreement or the dynamic purchasing system.
32004L0017 - Utilities (3rd generation) Article 17.3
3. With regard to framework agreements and dynamic purchasing systems, the estimated value to be taken into consideration shall be the maximum estimated value net of VAT of all the contracts envisaged for the total term of the agreement or system.
31993L0038 - Utilities (2nd generation) Article 14.9
9. The basis for calculating the value of a framework agreement shall be the estimated maximum value of all the contracts envisaged for the period in question.
31990L0531 - Utilities (1st generation) Article 12.5
5. The basis for calculating the value of a framework agreement shall be the estimated maximum value of all the contracts envisaged for the period in question.

EU Cases

Case PteRefText
C-79/94
Greece		13.p1 + 15G1-na [C3-
G1-5.1.a
G1-na [C3-9.9]		13 Explaining the reasons for its non-compliance with the advertising rules laid down in Article 9 of the directive, the Greek Government states that the framework agreement is no more than a structure within which numerous supply contracts are awarded, the value of none of which exceeds the threshold of ECU 200 000 laid down in the first indent of Article 5(1)(a) of the directive.
    15 So far as concerns the argument based on the value of the contracts in question, the framework agreement turns into a whole the various contracts which it governs and the total value of those contracts is greater than ECU 200 000. Furthermore, as the Commission has correctly pointed out, any other interpretation of the first indent of Article 5(1)(a) of the directive would allow contract awarders to circumvent the obligations which it imposes.