| | 32004L0018: c3-43.1.s1Include at least 
32004L0018 - Classic (3rd generation) | Article 43.1.s1 | Section 5 Reports Article 43 Content of reports For every contract, framework agreement, and every establishment of a dynamic purchasing system, the contracting authorities shall draw up a written report which shall include at least the following: | 32004L0017 - Utilities (3rd generation) | Article 50.1.1 | Article 50 Information to be stored concerning awards 1. Contracting entities shall keep appropriate information on each contract which shall be sufficient to permit them at a later date to justify decisions taken in connection with: | 31993L0037 - Works (2nd generation) | Article 8.3.1.s1 | 3. For each contract awarded, the contracting authorities shall draw up a written report which shall include at least the following: | 31993L0036 - Goods (2nd generation) | Article 7.3.1.s1 | 3. For each contract awarded the contracting authorities shall draw up a written report which shall include at least the following: | 31992L0050 - Services (2nd generation) | Article 12.3.1.s1 | 3. For each contract awarded, the contracting authorities shall draw up a written report which shall include at least the following: | 31993L0038 - Utilities (2nd generation) | Article 41.1.s1 | 1. Contracting entities shall keep appropriate information on each contract which shall be sufficient to permit them at a later date to justify decisions taken in connection with: | 31998L0004 - Amendment of Utilities (2nd generation) | Article 1.11=U-41.1.s1 | 1. Contracting entities shall keep appropriate information on each contract which shall be sufficient to permit them at a later date to justify decisions taken in connection with: | 31989L0440 - Fourth amendment of Works (1st generation) | Article 1.8=W1-5a.3.1.s1 | 3. For each contract awarded the contracting authorities shall draw up a written report which shall include at least the following: | 31990L0531 - Utilities (1st generation) | Article 33.1.s1 | Article 33 1. Contracting entities shall keep appropriate information on each contract which shall be sufficient to permit them at a later date to justify decisions taken in connection with: |
Case | Pte | Ref | Text | T-183/00 Strabag | 45 | W3-8.3.s1 | 45 As for the applicant's second argument, alleging failure to draw up a report pursuant to Article 8(3) of Directive 93/37, the Court considers that it cannot be accepted. In that regard, it should be pointed out that, under that provision, for each contract awarded, the contracting authority is required to draw up a report (in the English version, `a written report') containing at least the details listed in the provision. For the contract in the present case the report to the CCAM drawn up by the Council includes 12 annexes, amongst them the Contract Notice, the record of the opening of the tendering procedure and a copy of the framework agreement concluded with De Waele. It must be stated that all the information required under Article 8(3) of Directive 93/37 (see paragraph 4 above) was contained in the report to the CCAM, in the CCAM's favourable opinion and in the Notice of contract awarded. The Council cannot be criticised for having reproduced that information in three documents rather than in one. In any event, the requirement to draw up a report under that provision arises out of the concern to ensure compliance with the principles of non-discrimination and transparency in the awarding of public works contracts. It should be noted that the applicant has not adduced the slightest evidence that those principles were infringed and, as the Court has already pointed out in paragraph 44 above, the procedure awarding the contract to De Waele complied with those principles. |
Case | Pte | Ref | Text | N-971029 Esbjerg Andels Renovationsselskab | 3 | S2-12.3 KNL1C1-5.2 | 3. Idet Klagenævnet ikke har kompetence til at påkende spørgsmål om straf og eventuel erstatning, afvises disse spørgsmål fra Klagenævnet. Klagenævnet finder efter sagens udfald ikke anledning til at tage stilling til, om indklagede tillige måtte have overtrådt tjenesteydelsesdirektivets artikel 12, stk. 3. [Klageren har til støtte for de nedlagte påstande bl.a. gjort gældende: ..... Hertil kommer, at indklagede på ingen måde har opfyldt sine forpligtelser i forhold til direktivets artikel 12, stk. 3, idet en meddelelse til EF-tidende efter direktivets artikel 16, stk. 1, jf. artikel 17, stk. 2 ikke er tilstrækkelig til opfyldelse af forpligtelserne efter direktivets artikel 12, stk. 3.] |
|
|